Monday 31 July 2006

the people's plan

This evening’s Cabinet was, as ever, comradely and constructive, with entertainment provided by a trio of Lib Dems, led by the Leader of the Lib Dem group, who made a real arse of himself over our People’s Plan (also known, in managerial and insomniac circles, as the Corporate Plan – not the name I would choose for a really ambitious plan of action for Lambeth’s people, including things like delivering decent homes, expanding school places, massive regeneration, anti-crime initiatives, action to promote equality, lifting people out of poverty and offering better youth services).

We’re all aware of his enormous passion for scoffing, but his high-pitched insistence that there is nothing in the plan about value for money seemed to suggest he hadn’t read the thing quite as thoroughly as he could have done. As my colleague Cllr Sally Prentice gently pointed out, the first of our three priority outcomes, stated prominently in the plan, is “delivering high quality services that focus on individuals’ needs and represent value for money.” Despite laughter around the room, he continued to shrill insistently that value for money doesn’t rate a mention.

The other two Lib Dem councillors who bothered to turn up also managed to make spectacles of themselves, one (their housing spokesman) by continuing to deny, largely through the medium of heckling, that they ever got anything wrong with housing, and the other declaring theatrically that he did not “recognise the chair” and that he had a democratic right to speak, he must be heard, etc, and then spouting utter drivel – most of which seemed to point the finger back at Lib Dem education and finance failures (his Leader held the finance brief during their four years of failure so was looking understandably touchy at this point – what was all that about value for money?). This last Lib Dem is the sort of councillor who turns up to meetings, makes what he thinks is a grand populist intervention and then sweeps out grandly, with everyone left unimpressed as the door creaks shut and wondering why he bothered to turn up. Because we share the same surname, I am always worried that the tripe he talks will be ascribed to me.

3 Comments »

Displaying results 1 to 3 out of 3
Steve said,
Fri, 4 Aug 2006 - 9:47 AM

They are just an example of what happens when the Lib Dims hopeless mismanagement is called to account by the electorate. Having failed in their four years in control they are now reduced to carping from the sidelines.

There is perhaps a lesson in this that some in our own party should learn. Personally I prefer to be in power, locally or nationally, but some would seem to enjoy the irresponsibility of opposition more.

Sarah Smith said,
Wed, 2 Aug 2006 - 3:46 PM

I don't think any Liberal could possibly be confused with your good self, councillor Bennett. Why don't they shut up after the embarrassing, nay, disastrous tenure at Lambeth? Were there any Tories there? Are there in fact, any left??

Alan Melville said,
Kennington

Wed, 2 Aug 2006 - 8:27 AM

Your description is spot on Mark. I was at the meeting and every time a Liberal spoke I was wondering how the hell they got in four years ago. Never again I say!

It was good to see so many Labour councillors at the meeting too and making really strong contributions. I'm proud Lambeth has a Labour council with big plans.

Thursday 27 July 2006

gas and water

It’s repellent to see British Gas shooting prices up today, with the expectation that the consumers – often people who can least afford even a tiny rise in prices – are expected to foot the bill for business failures. In Britain we pay more for gas than mainland Europe.

At the same time it’s surely morally wrong to be doling out money to shareholders. It often seems the utilities are the only industries where this kind of behaviour happens on such a scale and yet goes unchecked.

On a smaller scale, in my ward Thames Water appears to be intent on tipping any remaining goodwill literally down the drain. I’ve had an eleventh hour email from a “Community Liaison Executive” giving me a few days notice that Thames Water is planning to do something major in one of the busiest roads in the ward, Eardley Road. They tell me, in blandese, that they will be “tackling leakage, replacing the Victorian water pipes and finding and fixing leaks. We are also changing the way we manage the complex network of pipes that deliver water to your taps.” This will apparently cause inconvenience, which I take to mean they will be ploughing up the road, though they don’t say so.



2 Comments »

Displaying results 1 to 2 out of 2
Maxine Foster said,
Maida Vale

Wed, 9 Aug 2006 - 4:13 PM

Couldn't agree more. And as for Thames Water - give me strength!

Maxine

Angelina Marriott said,
essex

Thu, 3 Aug 2006 - 7:28 PM

If British Gas had not been privatised, it would not be doling out money to shareholders. We are now paying the price for the sale of national assets. The theory of it creating competition and inturn improving service and keeping prices down has proved to be untrue.

Wednesday 26 July 2006

pigs in lipstick

What’s all this about “pigs in lipstick”? It seems a little ungallant of Douglas Alexander to be speaking in such terms about the Tories, but he seems to be making a valid point about a party whose leader talks about change as if it has already happened, when in fact his party is still the same old raddled right wing rag bag.

I shall be gallant. In Lambeth, the Tories seem to be far from being pigs in lipstick. Sheep would be nearer the mark. The new intake have yet to make much impression, so we don’t know if in their spare time they are hugging hoodies and visiting glaciers and weeping for the planet at dinner parties in Notting Hill, or even Gipsy Hill.

One of them looks uncannily like my neighbour upstairs, but he isn’t. Whenever he speaks in the council chamber, my eyes tend to wander up to the plaster cherubs above, my mind wandering far away too. When I look back at him, after moments in contemplation of Edwardian music hall baroque, I always feel a momentary confusion that my neighbour from upstairs is addressing council. It keeps happening and it can be quite unnerving.

3 Comments »

Displaying results 1 to 3 out of 3
Cllr Mark Bennett said,
Streatham

Wed, 2 Aug 2006 - 9:05 AM

Jason and Martin

Thanks for the comments. On Cameron's hugging of hoodies, let's just say I doubt the Tories will be bothering to embrace the hoodies of Streatham. Let's face it, it's a transparent ploy to win votes over from the Lib Dems, who are soft on thugs and soft on drugs. There must come a tipping point when the reactionaries in the Tory party, who have mostly stayed silent up to now, will start to ask what's going on. Cue the dismantling of the facade and out roll the Daily Mail Daleks.

On the comments of the Tory councillor in Brighton, I'm saddened but not surprised. In Lambeth, around this time last year, a Tory councillor wrote a letter to the South London Press comparing gay men to "sex offenders and other criminals".

The Tories do equality when they think it will win votes, not because it's a matter of principle; when they think it will lose votes, it doesn't take Mystic Meg to predict howls of "political correctness gone mad" and calls for the reintroduction of Section 28.

Which is why it's so important that Labour wins the next election.

Martin said,
Fri, 28 Jul 2006 - 4:01 PM

The Tories havn't changed a bit, Cameron might like to try and be something different from previous Tory leaders but the rest of the party is still the same old nasty party it always was. A Tory councillor in Brighton was recently overheard saying he believed homosexuals were paedophiles, nasty right wing bigot. That sadly is the true face of the Tory party. Be warned, Cameron may like to be different but the Tory party is still full of these idiots. Imagine if they were allowed back in to govern with people like that representing them.

Jason said,
London

Fri, 28 Jul 2006 - 3:54 PM

Hi, I was wondering how Cameron's 'Hug a Hoodie' campaign was going down on the streets of Streatham!?

Monday 24 July 2006

Streatham Youth Court

The title of this post is not what it seems. Let me explain. I’m having a bit of a to-do with council officers over my objection to the use of the name Charles Court for a new development off Streatham High Road.

I may be getting a bit Pooterish, but this is the gist my objection. The use of a first name for a road or any other residential development adds little to the sense of history that should inform landmark naming in Streatham. Believe it or not, Charles Court seems to be the choice of the developer based purely on the first name of a man who once owned the land.

We might as well resign ourselves to calling new developments by names such as Betty Mansions or Derek Avenue or Bill Crescent. My view is we reduce the value of street names, and ignore local history, when we opt for the easy answer.

I’ve got a list of possible names which could be used. Top of my list is Edward Neale, born in Streatham in 1805. He was a prize fighter who, boxing as Ned Neale, went by the nickname of the "Streatham Youth". He died in 1846 and is buried in West Norwood. It’s a choice that would be in line with the council’s stated policy that a connection should "have a historical connection with the area ... [and] ... be a name of a notable person who was born or lived in the area."

Now obviously, Streatham Youth Court would be confusing, so we will have to leave that one alone. But what about Ned Neale Court, or simply Neale Court?

I’m not the only councillor who has objected to Charles Court apparently, and it transpires this matter of overwhelming importance is being referred to the Streatham Area Committee in September. Since the committee is dominated 9-3 by Lib Dems I have a suspicion we will have a lengthy discussion ending in the kind of comfortable compromise the Lib Dem majority can live with – Charles Court.

Friday 21 July 2006

improving Streatham Vale Park

One of the regular working group meetings this morning, monitoring the regeneration of Streatham Vale Park and chaired in no nonsense style by Keith Hill MP. Disbelief all round that the bowling pavilion has again been seriously vandalised, the immediate consequence being it was impossible to use it for our meeting.

Instead, we found a shady spot under a tree nearby and talked through progress, the main plank of which was the transfer of a pesky little strip of land at the edge of the park from Lambeth Housing to Lambeth Parks. The transfer is a saga which has been going on since I have been attending the meetings. My first duty as an elected councillor on 21 October 2005 was attending one of these meetings, and we are still discussing many of the same issues.

Hopefully, now that the bureaucratic transfer of the land from one part of the council to another has been accomplished (this piece of history was made at 8.30pm last night) we can now see the creation of a masterplan for the park. I am relieved that my ward colleague Cllr John Kazantzis (Cabinet Member for Housing) and Cabinet Member for Environment Lib Peck, urged on by me and my other ward colleague Dave Malley, have pinned the issue down to conclusion.

Being in a suit, Keith stood up throughout the meeting, while a circle of the regulars – councillors, council officers, the Friends of Streatham Vale Park - sat round him on the parched grass. Leah, the Streatham town centre manager, pointed out to me with one of her mischievous smiles that I was learning at the feet of a master.

3 Comments »

Displaying results 1 to 3 out of 3
Marc Fortuna said,
Sherwood Avenue

Wed, 31 Jan 2007 - 2:58 PM

It's good to see that finally an ellected council is working for Streatham because usually all the efforts from Lambeth is placed in brixton. I am glad I voted for you and I want to thank you for being a leader and for really representing Streatham voters.

Mark Bennett said,
Streatham

Tue, 25 Jul 2006 - 6:19 PM

Thanks for the suggestions, Richard. It may be that the pavilion could have several uses. There is already a 1 o'clock club in the park, but it would be nice to see a facility for pensioners, perhaps a cafe, and a library would be a welcome addition - bringing people into the park and its lovely environment to enjoy it in a variety of ways. The more people who use the park, the safer it will feel and the fewer opportunities for vandals.

I actually raised the idea of library use to the appropriate council officer yesterday, and it appeared that it was something which had not previously been thought of.

Richard Rickitt said,
Streatham Vale

Tue, 25 Jul 2006 - 12:55 PM

Thank you for taking interest in our local park.

The re-surfacing of the tennis courts has already helped to bring new life into this under-used corner of the park - I have already seen several groups playing tennis there for the first time in years.

Sorry to hear about the mindless vandalism in the Pavillion - perhaps not surprising given its currently abandoned state. Hopefully you will find new ways to turn this building into a great resource at the heart of the immediate community - much as it was when being used by the bowls club.

Could the bowling be re-started? How about a pensioner's club, playgroup or local library?

Keep up the good work!

Thursday 20 July 2006

Streatham and Stockwell

Out in the baking afternoon sunshine for a walkabout with Jill, a resident from the South Streatham Neighbourhood Watch, to carry out one of our regular audits of pavement defects, potholes, graffiti etc. We have just bid auf wiedersehen to Oliver, the chair, who has gone to live in Stuttgart. This was Jill’s first time “on the beat” and we covered Ellison, Danbrook, Hepworth and Colmer Roads. We ended up with quite a list which I will forward to the relevant parts of the council for action when I have managed to decipher my notes, which will not be easy as my pen kept drying up in the heat.

Later, after sitting in for a while on a thoughtful staff LBGT forum at the Town Hall, I went to the Community Police Consultative Group meeting in Brixton Road regarding the de Menezes shooting and implications of the CPS decision. My colleague Cllr Imogen Walker, a Stockwell councillor, was there and I sat next to her.

It was a difficult meeting with no resolution, not least because of interjections from the Green Party and Respect on the issue of Iraq, which were not particularly insightful in terms of the specific events of 22 July last year. Finding a resolution won’t be helped by the trial process which will now be gone through – rightly, of course – but I understand it means we are unlikely to see the Independent Police Complaints Commission report for another year or more.

Sunday 16 July 2006

a good day out

Tennis first thing, on the newly relaid courts in Streatham Vale Park. Then to the second day of the Lambeth Country Show. The sun continued to smile on Brockwell Park. I browsed for a while at various stalls and tents. Stopped off for a mystery-shopper style look at the various community safety related displays, which impressed me, then bumped into Labour colleague Cllr Paul McGlone, who was also heading for the Mayor’s marquee. It was crowded, councillors of all parties, police, clergy, others, with Cllr Liz Atkinson, this year’s Mayor, making everyone welcome, all smiles in the borough’s bling. We had a nice lunch, chatting and watching manoeuvres by the sea cadets and a display of jousting by some medieval knights, who must, verily, have been frying under their chain mail.

There was also an intriguing exercise which I can only describe as spaniel charming. Being in a roped off marquee at the side of the display ground was a bit too rarefied for my liking, so it was nice to slip away eventually and sit on the grass with everyone else. Chats later on with Tessa Jowell and Keith Hill, who were taking turns to mind the Labour Party stall. It was also enjoyable, on the spur of the moment, to go on a few of the gravity-defying fairground rides, egged on by Cllrs Dan Fitzpatrick and Christopher Wellbelove. Horizontal, perpendicular, upside down – whichever way you look at Brockwell Park, the Lambeth Country Show makes a good day out.

Saturday 15 July 2006

Lambeth Country Show

Record attendance for this morning’s surgery, with around 30 residents passing through. I was hoping to sit outside in the sunshine but the numbers meant we were better off sitting down inside instead, where we had what amounted to an impromptu public meeting.

The main issue was a planning application which seems to have been sprung on residents at the last minute, in the inimitable way Lambeth’s Planning Department seems to operate. I had a wander down the road after the surgery to look at the proposed site for myself. It seems a ridiculously small and cramped space for the building proposed in the plans.

I jumped on a 255 bus to get from the surgery to the St Leonards church fete, where local children had just finished their parade along Streatham High Road, turning many a head and prompting many a smile in their wake. Not an everyday sight in Streatham, local children in tinselled costumes with painted faces and banners. All part of the annual revelry that is the Streatham Festival, which continues to develop with every passing year, thanks to the hard work of the many people who organise events, and the growing enthusiasm of local people who attend them, whether they are comedy nights or jazz concerts or Shakespeare in the Rookery.

Off then, on the Thameslink from Streatham to Herne Hill, to help mind the party’s stall at the Lambeth Country Show, selling books donated by party members. I had a flick through a book called Modern Political Thought, which I’ve no doubt it could claim to be when it was published in 1928. Some interesting views on Bolshevism.

Blazing hot afternoon, with thousands of people in Brockwell Park having a good time. Lambeth Country Show is a real unifier. John Whelan, leader of Lambeth’s Conservative Group, shimmered into view from nowhere, like the shopkeeper from Mr Benn, to exchange pleasantries (and a few unpleasantries about the Lib Dems) with Neil Sabharwal and myself before turning round and disappearing into the crowd, revealing the words Team Whelan on his back. I wonder if all Lambeth’s Tory councillors have to wear those.

Friday 14 July 2006

meeting with the police

Into Victoria for a meeting organised by John Roberts, Lambeth’s Independent Member of the Metropolitan Police Authority, to take stock of how Safer Neighbourhoods is working in Lambeth. Senior police officers were there, including Borough Commander Martin Bridger and Deputy Commissioner Alf Hitchcock (perfect name for a crime fighter). A good turnout of active members of Safer Neighbourhood panels across the borough made for a productive meeting.

Lots of politics is sitting in rooms discussing strategic overviews and business plans and other abstract notions, but this event was about people speaking about their experiences with the police and the council and advising us how we can best make Lambeth’s communities safer, actively tackle crime at a local level and really engage at street level.

People shared best practice – some are setting up their own websites, some are talking to other panels to avoid displacement issues, that sort of thing. We heard how things are working in individual areas and I think people took away ideas and advice to report back to their panels which they will undoubtedly put into practice. The issue of involving young people was a recurring theme. I made a number of points when I spoke to the meeting - that Lambeth needs to concentrate on providing more activities for young people, as well as involving them in Safer Neighbourhoods; also that councillors who attend panels should be as accountable as the police – we are working in partnership and that covers accountability too.

I was pleased to see Sam and Musse from the new Streatham South panel, who had made time to attend despite less than a day’s notice. As I went round the room between discussion groups, they were clearly making a full contribution.

1 Comments »

Displaying results 1 to 1 out of 1
Tamsin Morebridge said,
Birmingham

Thu, 27 Jul 2006 - 6:21 PM

I'm impressed by your commitment. I used to live in Stockwell when I worked in London - I moved away but if you can make Stockwell feel safer you are doing a good job.

Tamsin

Wednesday 12 July 2006

local panel for local people

This evening I attended the first meeting of the Streatham South Community Panel, at St Bartholomew’s Church Hall. The panel will be scrutinising the work of Streatham South’s new Safer Neighbourhood police team, four of whom were there when I arrived. The police are raring to go.

A very good turnout from residents, with a good spread from across south Streatham and Streatham Vale. As people introduced themselves I was struck by how many had lived in Streatham, and in the same part of Streatham, for upwards of thirty, forty and fifty years.

As a mere Streatham stripling of only eight years standing, I’m proud of the people who have lived here, as they say, for “donkey’s years.” They have a real fund of stories about Streatham as it used to be, coupled in the case of this panel with a desire to take on the criminals and the vandals and make Streatham better for the future. The optimism is infectious and there is a real enthusiasm for police back on the beat. We all had a good discussion about what might be the policing priorities for the ward.

One of the residents expressed a little concern that to be properly representative, there should be some young people coming along to future meetings. Definitely. Getting the cross-section right is something to work on, but the good things are the panel has been delivered by Labour and it’s actually up and running – criminals and ne’er-do-wells beware.


2 Comments »

Displaying results 1 to 2 out of 2
Steve said,
Ipswich

Tue, 25 Jul 2006 - 4:40 PM

Glad to hear about your community panels and congratulations on taking Lambeth back. It's a shame that the Liberals and Tories running the Council here don't do much about talking to the community.

John Adams said,
Southwark

Mon, 24 Jul 2006 - 3:49 PM

Community policing has made a huge difference in my area. However I am very disappointed by my local Lib Dem Council.

They just don't want to back up local people and the local police by using the powers the government have given them to crackdown on yobs and anti social behaviour.

Friends of mine in Lambeth always are getting something through their door from their local councillors giving really useful information about how they are working with the police to do what is needed.

Anything in Southwark? Nothing!

Tuesday 11 July 2006

first entry

Caught the 118 bus this morning to be at the 409 Project in Stockwell Road. I was there with my colleagues Cllr Neil Sabharwal and Cllr Kingsley Abrams for a visit by Valerie Amos.

Valerie arrived to find out more about diversionary activities for young people in Lambeth. The 409 project suffered in recent years from a failure by the Lib Dem Tory administration to put youth provision on a stable footing, or see it as a matter of urgency. Earlier in the year, before the May elections, the 409 nearly closed completely.

Giving young people positive activities to steer them away from offending is one of Labour’s top priorities in Lambeth. The youngsters who use the centre – and it really is an anchor for many of them – were really interesting to listen to, with lots of stories about the problems of growing up in Lambeth. We watched a DVD the 409ers made recently, which was fascinating.

One statement from their DVD struck me in particular: “Often we find ourselves in tricky situations where decisions have to be made about what we do. The more informed about what we do the more we think about consequences of our decisions, the better decisions we are able to make.”

Wise advice, whether for you’re 17 or 37, whether you’re picking your life up to go to college, or trying to pick up other people’s lives as a councillor.

After an hour of catching up with casework in the stuffiness of the Town Hall I cross the road and settle down in the stalls at the Ritzy to see a screening of the Speak Out Film Project, a powerful film examining the experience of former drug addicts from the BME community. They tell their own stories, which are deeply affecting.

The clear message for the council and the various agencies we work with is that many more people need and want to be helped into treatment.

I was there just to see and learn. My colleague Cllr Lorna Campbell, who is Deputy Cabinet Member for Inclusion and Tackling Poverty, was still visibly moved by the film as she rose to speak. This is some of what she said:

“This kind of project is so important. I’m positive that throughout the process of making this production, so much has been learnt by those involved, staff and all of those associated with the project. But the importance is that it is a living project, this material will go on to educate and train so many people whether they be service users, schools, youth and community workers and professionals within the fields of substance misuse and community safety.”

The emphasis of the event was recovery from drugs. But it was also a BME event and it was clear that people were curious to hear from one of Lambeth’s new BME councillors. Lorna added: “As a Labour party in Lambeth we made a commitment to improving representation from the BME Community. Before the election there were only 4 councillors from BME backgrounds in the whole council. Now Labour has 12 councillors from BME backgrounds, and 14 councillors in total.”



Comments:

Simon Smith said,
Vauxhall

Mon, 24 Jul 2006 - 11:45 AM

Mark

Congrats on getting reelected in May and chucking out the Lib Dems. They so utterly deserved it. Your story about disadvantaged youngsters strikes a chord - I was offered drugs TWICE on saturday afternoon just round the corner from my place - and after a while you get a bit sick of it. Good luck on the council and get stuck into the issues as well as having the odd prod at the Tories....